Re: VLSM and IGRP redistribution

From: Stephen Oliver (stevie_oliver@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 24 2001 - 06:45:55 GMT-3


   
Sorry,

My mail should have read,

Every book I read says use the summary address command for external routes
being redistributed INTO OSPF. I know it works but I thought there may have
been another "more correct" way.

Stevie.

>From: "Robert Dubell" <bobdu11@home.com>
>Reply-To: "Robert Dubell" <bobdu11@home.com>
>To: "Stephen Oliver" <stevie_oliver@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: VLSM and IGRP redistribution
>Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 05:02:51 -0400
>
>That is the proper way to redistribute from a OSPF into IGRP. Using the
>summary-address command on the ASBR....
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Stephen Oliver <stevie_oliver@hotmail.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:01 AM
>Subject: VLSM and IGRP redistribution
>
>
> >How many ways can you accomplish VLSM into IGRP redistribution.
> >
> >I have a router running OSPF on one interface and IGRP on the other.
>It's
> >an ASBR. I have a class B address on both sides but with a /24 mask.
>The
> >OSPF side is all area 0 and from another router in that area some /26 and
> >/27 routes are being sent. When redistributing these routes into IGRP
>what
> >are the options.
> >
> >Every book I read says the ospf command
> >
> ># summary-address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
> >
> >is used when summarizing external routes into OSPF however this is the
>only
> >way I can get the routes accross to IGRP. I put the command
> >
> ># summary-address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.0
> >
> >on the ASBR for each of the /26 and /27 routes and they go over to the
>IGRP
> >router. A route to null 0 is created on the ASBR as expected but since
>this
> >is /24 the more specific route of /26 or /27 takes precenence.
> >
> >Is this the proper way to do this ? I got the problem from a well known
> >testing software page and they use the Area Range command which seems
> >irrelevant in this case and does not work anyway.
> >
> >Thanks, Stevie.
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:24 GMT-3