From: Chuck Church (cchurch@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Oct 18 2001 - 23:47:05 GMT-3
Sorry. I forgot to put 'no infectious-disease route-cache' on the necessary
interfaces. 'Debug things-that-make-me-not-live' should have caught this.
My bad...
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Martin, Chris
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Church, Chuck; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OT - (Simple Solution for Anthrax Letters)
yes but you forget that when you have multi layer switching enabled, or mls
and you try to do repetitious things without looking at the process (cause
you remembered how to do it before) your route-map will not work because it
only checks your interface (you) when you do a process instead of
instantaneously. You need to disable your multilayer switching in your head
and remember to check everything before initiating a process, that way your
route-map will work and you will not get infected.
At our company we just put security at layer 1 and made everyone wear body
condoms with a stout on the top with a filter for air..
----- Original Message -----
From: "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@USTA.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: OT - (Simple Solution for Anthrax Letters)
> I was able to use a route-map to get around the PO box issue. I put
> the access-list on a virtual mailbox interface, and policy route all mail
> from the PO interface to the virtual mailbox int. Then another route-map
> forwards it to the human interface (me). It's not fast-switched, but it
> beats shoving cotton swabs up my nose! As of just now, I have not
received
> any anthrax on my human interface.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Brian Dennis
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:03 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Paul Borghese
> Subject: Re: OT - (Simple Solution for Anthrax Letters)
>
>
> Paul,
> Just use an access-list on your mailbox.
>
>
> access-list 2101 deny anthrax any any log
> access-list 2101 permit biohazard any any
>
> int mailbox 0
> postal address 1010 Main St. San Jose, CA 95120
> biohazard access-list 2101 in
>
>
> The only problem is that Cisco doesn't support the biohazard access-list
for
> PO boxes.
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640
> 5G Networks, Inc.
> brian@5g.net
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Paul Borghese" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>
> Reply-To: "Paul Borghese" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:06:11 -0400
>
> >No no no no!
> >
> >It turns out Anthrax may be destroyed through radiation. So the solution
> is
> >to use radiation on the mail - and there are systems that you can
purchase
> >to do just that. The problem is they are a couple million dollars. This
> >came up during a discussion with an "expert" on one of the
> >All-Anthrax-All-the-Time cable stations.
> >
> >The host asked if placing the mail in the microwave would have the same
> >effect. The guest did not know the answer, but you have to admit it is a
> >compelling idea.
> >
> >So I plan to microwave my mail :-)
> >
> >Paul
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:22 GMT-3