RE: CAT OS or native IOS on Catalyst ?

From: Asbjorn Hojmark (Asbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Oct 18 2001 - 20:54:40 GMT-3

• Next message: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: Cat5k NFFC-II vs RSFC"
• Previous message: michael robertson: "Re: GET STUCKED AT FATKID 394 IPSEC-NAT ( some questions about NAT and IPSEC))"
• Maybe in reply to: Yifan (Eric) Wang: "CAT OS or native IOS on Catalyst ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
> Theoretically no performance impact with IDS blades on the
> switch.

That's not entirely true.

If you're running a 6500 with SFM and only fabric-enabled blades,
you can do 30 Mpps. As soon as you drop in the (non-fabric) IDS,
the box will fall back to 15 Mpps.

This of course is of limited real-world importance.

-A

--
Heroes: Vint Cerf & Bob Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Robert Metcalfe
Links : http://www.hojmark.org/networking/

• Next message: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: Cat5k NFFC-II vs RSFC"
• Previous message: michael robertson: "Re: GET STUCKED AT FATKID 394 IPSEC-NAT ( some questions about NAT and IPSEC))"
• Maybe in reply to: Yifan (Eric) Wang: "CAT OS or native IOS on Catalyst ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:21 GMT-3