From: Michael Wong (Michael.Wong@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2001 - 03:42:59 GMT-3
Bob
Did you get a resolution to this problem .... I've just experienced the same th
ing. Could you fill me in on how you resolved this.
Thanks .... MW :)
-----Original Message-----
From: rsevier [mailto:rsevier@zealousolutions.com]
Sent: Monday, 27 August 2001 4:54 am
To: Bob Chahal; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: redistributing IPX floating static
Sorry I just read that you have already done that. yeah, the network(s)
must be present. you bring up a good point though about aggregating routes.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Bob Chahal
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 10:46 AM
To: rsevier; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: redistributing IPX floating static
Yep, its a typo, sorry.
R3 is connected via frame-relay to R5. On R3 I create a static route
ipx route 12345670 FFFFFFFC 200.0000.0000.0001
and then do
ipx router eigrp 1
redistribute static
when a do a show run the "redistribute static" is not in the config and the
route does not appear in the ipx routing table on R5
R3 config
interface FastEthernet0/0
ipx network 200
ipx output-gns-filter 1000
ipx gns-reply-disable
!
interface Serial0/0
ipx network 5130
frame-relay map ipx 5130.0000.2222.0000 225
frame-relay map ipx 5130.0000.3333.0000 225
frame-relay map ipx 5130.0000.5555.0000 225 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
!
ipx route 12345670 FFFFFFFC 200.0000.0000.0001
!
ipx router eigrp 1
network 5130
!
!
ipx router rip
no network 5130
!
R5 IPX routing table
20 Total IPX routes. Up to 1 parallel paths and 16 hops allowed.
Current default route is:
E FFFFFFFE [266521600/2] via 695.0000.0c3e.7424, age 00:15:27,
1u, Et0
SA 800 FFFFFFFC [**/**] via 6005.0000.6666.0000, Di0
C 695 (NOVELL-ETHER), Et0
C 700 (NOVELL-ETHER), BV1
C 5004 (FRAME-RELAY), Se0.2
C 5130 (FRAME-RELAY), Se0.1
C 6005 (PPP), Di0
E 200 [2172416/1] via 5130.0000.2222.0000, age 00:13:55,
1u, Se0.1
E 300 [2185984/1] via 5130.0000.3333.0000, age 00:15:09,
1u, Se0.1
E 400 [2172416/1] via 5004.0000.4444.0000, age 00:13:58,
1u, Se0.2
E 800 [267929600/2] via 695.0000.0c3e.7424, age 00:15:09,
1u, Et0
E 801 [267929600/2] via 695.0000.0c3e.7424, age 00:15:09,
1u, Et0
E 802 [267929600/2] via 695.0000.0c3e.7424, age 00:15:09,
1u, Et0
E 803 [267929600/2] via 695.0000.0c3e.7424, age 00:15:09,
1u, Et0
E 66666666 [45867776/1] via 695.0000.0c3e.7424, age 00:15:29,
51u, Et0
E 88888888 [269337600/2] via 695.0000.0c3e.7424, age 00:15:12,
1u, Et0
There's no sign of network 12345678. The same thing happens for a an
aggregated floating static. A floating static for a specific network workd
fine but not for an aggregated route. I've rebooted routers etc. I was
wondering if someoen could simulate this and give some feedback.
Thanks again
bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "rsevier" <rsevier@zealousolutions.com>
To: "Bob Chahal" <bob.chahal@ntlworld.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 4:11 PM
Subject: RE: redistributing IPX floating static
> B- First you have a IP route rather than an IPX route, but I think that
is
> a typo because I don't think the router will allow you to input that
> statement. Also, you mention floating static in the subject, but I don't
> see any evidence of a floating static route anywhere in your post. Post a
> config and a sho ipx route, and I think we can figure it out.
>
> Raymond
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Bob Chahal
> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 1:26 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: redistributing IPX floating static
>
>
> I can't seem to redistribute aggregated statics or floating statics into
rip
> or eigrp. For example, if a create an aggregate static route for ipx
> networkds 800 to 803 by
>
> ip route 800 fffffffc 6005.0000.6666.0000
>
> then do
>
> ipx router eigrp 1
> redistribute static
>
> the aggregate route is not propagated to the other routers in the EIGRP
> routing domain. I've tried this on v11.2 and v12.07. Has anyone got a
> solution for this? or seen this before?
>
> Once again appreciate any feedback on this.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bob
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:18 GMT-3