From: Brian Dennis (brian@xxxxxx)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 16:05:18 GMT-3
All Marc was asking about was the one-day lab "format". He wasn't asking for
anything more. If this is so wrong why did Cisco let Bruce Caslow take the
beta one-day lab to evaluate this "format" seeing as he writes CCIE prep
courses for Mentor? We all know the results of his lab but he still got to
see the "format" and incorporate it into his classes. If it is so secretive,
I would imagine that he wouldn't have been allowed to see it in the first
place. As a side note I don't think that Marc Russell is really bound by any
Cisco NDA but I do think that it's mighty nice of him to honor it.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640
5G Networks, Inc.
brian@5g.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Peter van Oene
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:18 AM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: RE: 1-day lab format
>
>
> inline
>
> >My interpretation of technical content would be something more like this
> >"Hey did you hear that OSPF virtual-links now count for 90% of
> your score,
> >better know that concept cold." If a CCIE candidate is going to actually
> >gain an advantage by knowing the extent of preconfiguration of basic IP,
> >interfaces, etc. he/she is going to fail miserably and it is a non-issue.
> >How would this information help them pass the test? I guess I
> just don't get
> >it. Help me see the light.
>
> Cisco has decided not to make this information available to
> candidates and
> has expressly included such information in their NDA agreement as
> posted by
> Jay H. It's really not up to you or anyone else to judge the relative
> merits of this decision, rather you are simply to abide by it if you wish
> to participate in, and in your case directly profit from, the
> CCIE program.
>
> Peter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:17 GMT-3