From: Sandro Ciffali (sandyccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 10 2001 - 19:28:19 GMT-3
Marc made it very clear about the NDA, I don't think any of us are looking
at the technical content in the lab, We are looking at the lab. structure.
The web site not necessarily provides all the information, The information I
would look for is without violating NDA, For example like some one failed
the lab and had a chance to verify??, Did the result contaned the config
also??? How was the result fomrulated was ot explnatory ??? Were the guys
who got result in hand were satisfied?? How did guys manage the timing in
the lab.?? Was the time enough etc. etc., There are hundreds of questions i
can think of that some one can answer without violating NDA.
Sandro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Hennigan" <jay@west.net>
To: "Marc Russell" <mrussell@ccbootcamp.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: 1-day lab format
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Marc Russell wrote:
>
> > We are looking for feedback from individuals that have actually taken
the
> > new 1-day lab. Please don't break the NDA, we don't want technical
content.
> > We just want to know as to what extent the network is pre-configured. Is
it
> > just basic IP addressing and activated interfaces or more complex issues
> > like ISDN setup, frame-relay setup, or basic routing protocols, etc.
>
> How could revealing that information NOT be an NDA violation? What one
> sees in the lab should stay in the lab. What Cisco chooses to reveal
> about it can be found at Cisco's website. The pre-configuration of the
> lab is indeed technical content, is it not?
>
> --
> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay@west.net
> NetLojix Communications, Inc. - http://www.netlojix.com/
> WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:16 GMT-3