From: routerjocky (elouie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 19:21:03 GMT-3
> Yes,
> Doyle clearly points out that even when the network 172.19.35.15
> Statement is removed, this secondary address CAN be advertised in
> OSPF as long as the primary is running OSPF, although the secondary
> Will not be able to source Hellos.
NO absolutely NOT TRUE! If he did, then it needs to be added to the errata
of the book. How can you even think that it would be advertised without a
network statement in OSPF? think about that one for just a second...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:13 GMT-3