From: John Elias (jelias_@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2001 - 19:35:24 GMT-3
Go to the www.bootcamp.com website and do some resreach, it tells you
about the 1024 number.
John E.
CCIE #8150
>From: "Donald B Johnson jr" <dbjohnson@adelphia.net>
>Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson jr" <dbjohnson@adelphia.net>
>To: "Sasa Milic" <smilic@EUnet.yu>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: New R&S Exam Tidbits
>Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 11:03:18 -0700
>
>Actually 500Hz = .5KHz
>Just a little RF humor.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Sasa Milic" <smilic@EUnet.yu>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:28 PM
>Subject: Re: New R&S Exam Tidbits
>
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > who told you that kilohertz is 1024 hertz ?!
> >
> >
> > Sasa
> >
> > Jeff Kesemeyer wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually it started with #1024.
> > > Where kilohertz starts, "it's either going to kill or hurt them ."
> > > Started by TAC as a who knows more type test.
> > >
> > > I believe #1024 is for the lab itself.
> > > I know Terry Slattery #1026 was the second.
> > > He was in charge of a rewrite of the operating system, from that
>learned
> > > ever command very well.
> > > Since he was a consultant he was also the first non-Cisco employee to
>get
> > > it.
> > >
> > > Jeff Kesemeyer
> > > CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNE
> > > www.bradshawlabs.com
> > > "Your CCIE Rack Rental Source"
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Monty.Majszak@Level3.com
> > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:18 PM
> > > To: bruce@williamsnetworking.com; Jim.Brown@CaseLogic.com;
> > > jkaberna@netcginc.com; scking@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: New R&S Exam Tidbits
> > >
> > > Bravo, well said guys. It's Cisco's cert and it appears as though
>they're
> > > going to do what they like with it so there's no point in sitting
>around
> > > griping about it. Stupid question, but anyone know who the very first
>CCIE
> > > was and if so if there still around, just curious. The first one would
>be
> > > 1001 right? Didn't they start at that #?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:59 PM
> > > To: Jim Brown; 'John Kaberna'; R. Scott King; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: New R&S Exam Tidbits
> > >
> > > That is a good point about the early CCIE Labs. If they decided to let
>us
> > > bring notes and stuff into the Lab now, we would all say that it is
>too
> > > easy. However, in reality it was extremely difficult back then and it
>always
> > > will be. I guess we dont really have to worry about the CCIE losing
>it's
> > > value.
> > >
> > > Bruce
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jim Brown" <Jim.Brown@CaseLogic.com>
> > > To: "'John Kaberna'" <jkaberna@netcginc.com>; "R. Scott King"
> > > <scking@cisco.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:40 PM
> > > Subject: RE: New R&S Exam Tidbits
> > >
> > > > The test has been in a state of change since its inception. In the
>days of
> > > > yesteryear....
> > > >
> > > > Candidates received all the material from the get go. You could go
>home
> > > and
> > > > research topics on the test and come back then next day and
>complete.
> > > >
> > > > Candidates could bring in laptops with them to use for configuration
>with
> > > > any digital material they desired.
> > > >
> > > > You could haul in any paper configs, books, or notes to take the
>exam.
> > > >
> > > > How about the CCIE's who took their exam during the early 90's on
>5-6
>AGS
> > > > routers with 10.0 code? Voice over X, IPSec, and other crazy
>features?
> > > >
> > > > The exam is in just another state of flux. Anybody that tells me it
>is
> > > worth
> > > > less know than it was a few years back is high. There are more
>features,
> > > > more material to cover, and more hardware.
> > > >
> > > > One day, two day, who cares. It is your skill and knowledge that
>will
> > > carry
> > > > you. I will consider the cert proof of my ability to learn and
>comprehend
> > > > new technologies.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: John Kaberna [mailto:jkaberna@netcginc.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:12 PM
> > > > To: R. Scott King; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: Re: New R&S Exam Tidbits
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Caslow and Remaker have both given their opinions about it. Caslow
> > > admitted
> > > > that there will be less topics (problem #1). TS is gone and even if
>they
> > > > change IP address or cables big deal (problem #2). People will now
>be
> > > able
> > > > to see the entire test without earning each section (problem #3).
>There
> > > > won't be a face-to-face debrief for people to potentially argue some
> > > points
> > > > (problem #4).
> > > >
> > > > You can argue that what I'm saying isn't true. At one point people
>argued
> > > > the world was flat too. Everything I just said is fact except for
> > > Caslow's
> > > > opinion. I think that his opinion on this subject should be weighed
>very
> > > > strongly though.
> > > >
> > > > John Kaberna
> > > > CCIE #7146
> > > > NETCG Inc.
> > > > Cisco Premier Partner
> > > > www.netcginc.com
> > > > (415) 750-3800
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:12 GMT-3