From: Fear, Russell H (Russell.Fear@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Sep 16 2001 - 09:33:13 GMT-3
I think you're right. Is it correct to leave the connection to timeout in
this way or should I be adjusting something to reduce this ? The lab
question I was working on said 'ensure no bridged traffic is lost as a
result of the primary connection failing.' I havent got any traffic
travelling over the link but assume it would be lost in the long fail-over.
Am I right ?
Thanks for your help,
Russell
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Chahal [mailto:bob.chahal@ntlworld.com]
Sent: 16 September 2001 13:01
To: Fear, Russell H; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSW back-up peer slow
Isn't this just the time the primary peer will take to timeout the DLSW peer
connection in the absence of DLSW keepalives.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fear, Russell H" <Russell.Fear@capgemini.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 11:55 AM
Subject: DLSW back-up peer slow
> I am setting up a DLSW back-up peer in my lab and notice that it takes a
> long time to swap over on failure of the primary peer. The switch back is
> fairly quick but the swap over on failure of the primary is very slow.
>
> Is there something such as a timer or time-out parameter that I should be
> tweaking to reduce this lag ?
>
> TIA
>
> Russell
>
>
> * 700 2201 Internal
> * +44 ( 0 ) 870 238 2201 External
> * russell.fear@capgemini.co.uk
>
>
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
****************
> " This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and
> is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only
for
> the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
you
> are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute,
or use
> this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error,
please
> notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ".
>
****************************************************************************
****************
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:18 GMT-3