From: Ravi (s_ravichandran@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Sep 16 2001 - 07:52:08 GMT-3
I agree.
May be the address given (4444.3333.2222) is already in non-canonical.
Regards,
Ravi
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Chahal <bob.chahal@ntlworld.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 6:37 AM
Subject: Bootcamp Lab 19 - DLSW
> Hi all,
>
> I've searched the archives and no one seems to have picked up on the q5 in
> task two.
>
> You are asked to configure a static resource on R6 for MAC address
> 4444.3333.2222. Since this router has only an ethernet configured as part
of
> DLSW then this resource would be an ethernet device. so shouldn't you be
> converting the address into non-canonical and configure as follows
>
> dlsw icanreach 2222.cccc.4444
>
> If this kind of thing comes up on the real lab I guess I'll ask the
proctor
> for clarification. And the same applies for q3 as this address range
> 3003.3003.xxxx could be for ethernet of token ring devices as the DLSW
> config includes both interface types.
>
> Anyone agree or disagree. Appreciate nay comments.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bob
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:18 GMT-3