Re: defualt-informaion originate

From: Darren Ward (dward@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 14 2001 - 18:19:13 GMT-3

• Next message: Jaspreet Bhatia: "An interesting Dialer-watch question"
• Previous message: Bobby Mann: "Nesting Access-lists?"
• Maybe in reply to: Armon Richardson: "defualt-informaion originate"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
The Lab is normally VERY specific on the static and default commands and whethe
r
or not you can use them.

Read the Lab booklet very carefully and ask the proctor if you're not sure.

Darren

Armon Richardson wrote:

> Can someone provide some input on the legality of this command in the lab
> environment. I know there may be times when the use of static/default routes
> are not permitted, but would you be penalized for dynamically injecting
> a default route into the routing process(default-information originate for
> OSPF, RIPv2 etc.) ?
>
> thanks,
>
> " Where the willingness is great, the difficulties cannot be great "
>
> Armon Richardson
> CNE, MCSE, CCNP, CCDP
> Network Systems Engineer
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: Jaspreet Bhatia: "An interesting Dialer-watch question"
• Previous message: Bobby Mann: "Nesting Access-lists?"
• Maybe in reply to: Armon Richardson: "defualt-informaion originate"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:18 GMT-3