From: Raji Mohan (raji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 14 2001 - 10:27:29 GMT-3
I had a question reg. DLSw between TR and Eth intf with two routers
specifically the example given in Hutnik and Satterlee (Pg 413-CCIE Lab
Practice Kit) . The example shows R1 with an Eth intf and R3 with a Token
Ring intf connected to each other thru Serial. To enable DLSw between the
two routers :
R1 :
dlsw local-peer peer-id <local ipaddress> promiscuous
dlsw bridge-group 2
source-bridge ring-group 169 ---------------> is this necessary?
int e0/0
ip address <ip_address>
bridge-group 2
!
bridge 2 protocol ieee
R3 :
source-bridge ring-group 169
dlsw local-peer peer-id <ip_address>
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <ip_address>
!
int tokenRing1/0
ip address <ip_addr>
source-bridge 10 1 169
source-bridge spanning
!
My question is 'is the source-bridge ring-group 169' statement required on
R1 which is a pure Eth router?
/raji
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:17 GMT-3