From: andrew.2.shore@xxxxxx
Date: Fri Sep 14 2001 - 04:26:11 GMT-3
One way I have done this in the past is to set up 2 HSRP address and point
half the clients at one and half at the other. Its very rough and dirty but
it does work.
Andrew Shore. CCNP+Security, MCSE, CCP, BSc
Network Consultant
Internetworking Solutions Limited
-----Original Message-----
From: vr4drvr . [mailto:adrian36@hotmail.com]
Sent: 13 September 2001 18:06
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: HSRP load sharing with redundant circuits
The important point is that HSRP has NOTHING to do with route forwarding
decisions, it is up to the routing protocol to enable those decisions and
with that (albeit common) configuration the routing protocol will not
reroute traffic to the other router, as per design. The MHSRP is an
acceptable solution. Route maps could work but it is an inefficient
solution as traffic will bounce from master to slave, thereby crossing the
LAN twice, but it will split traffic across the links if that is the major
concern. It would require a comlicated design which may turn around and
bite you when it comes time to troubleshooting.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>McHie, Anthony
>Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:07 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: HSRP load sharing with redundant circuits
>
>
>Hey gang,
>
>Here is my question:
>How do you get an HSRP master to make use of the circuit on the HSRP
>standby
>router? The circuits are low bandwidth full-duplex. The desired state
>is
>to have both circuits utilized for both TX and RX. I'm open to
>route-maps,
>routing protocols, or any other means. Thanks
>
> Current State
> ------------------
> HSRP 10.3.0.3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:17 GMT-3