From: Ravi (s_ravichandran@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Sep 08 2001 - 20:44:02 GMT-3
Thanks Brian,
I tried the following but it does not work
R2(config)# int e0
R2(config-if)# bridge-group 2
R2(config-if)# int e1
R2(config-if)# bridge-group 2
R2(config-if)#exit
R2(config)# dlsw bridge-group 2
R3(config)# dlsw port-list 5 ethernet 0
R2(config)# dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.0.0.1
R2(config)# dlsw remote-peer 5 tcp peer-id 10.0.0.2
Regards,
Ravi
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Lodwick <xpranax@hotmail.com>
To: <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: DLSW question
> Ravi,
> With what you want to do you can not use a bgroup-list because the way the
> bgroup-list works is by controlling which bridge groups the remote-peer
has
> access to and you can't specify different bridge groups on each ethernet
> interface of R2 because then host A and host B couldn't communicate
(unless
> you had CRB on the router to route between bridge groups which would be
more
> configuration and more processor utilization then what is needed for what
> you want) which was one of your requirements for your setup. You can only
> use a port-list and if I'm not mistaken if you don't have an ip address on
> the ethernet interfaces and you are purely bridging on those interfaces
you
> have to create a BVI using CRB to concurrently bridge and route on the
> router or routers that don't have an address on the ethernet interfaces.
> I've shown what the configs should look like below for port-list and
> bgroup-list.
>
>
> The port-list configuration is a little more granular and is not
associated
> with source-route or transparent bridging like a ring-list or a
bgroup-list.
> This is a way to control which interfaces a remote-peer connection has
> access to. In this config, connections from remote-peer 10.0.0.2 (address
of
> your R3 router) will only be able to access resources off of Ethernet 0.
> Notice in the remote-peer command the 5 associates port-list 5 to
> remote-peer 10.0.0.2.
>
> R2(config)# int e0
> R2(config-if)# bridge-group 2
> R2(config-if)# int e1
> R2(config-if)# bridge-group 2
> R2(config-if)#exit
> R2(config)# dlsw bridge-group 2
> R3(config)# dlsw port-list 5 ethernet 0
> R2(config)# dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.0.0.1
> R2(config)# dlsw remote-peer 5 tcp peer-id 10.0.0.2
>
>
>
> As I stated in the first paragraph the bgroup-list won't work for what you
> want but I thought I'd add the config for you anyway just to give you an
> idea of how it looks. The config below will make the connections from
> remote-peer only able to reach bridge-group 2 (ethernet 0). Notice in the
> remote-peer command the 7 associates bgroup-list 7 to remote-peer
> 10.0.0.2.
>
> R1(config)# int e0
> R1(config-if)# bridge-group 2
> R1(config-if)# int e1
> R1(config-if)# bridge-group 1
> R1(config-if)#exit
> R1(config)# dlsw bridge-group 2
> R1(config)# dlsw bridge-group 1
> R1(config)# dlsw bgroup-list 7 bgroups 2
> R1(config)# dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.0.0.1
> R1(config)# dlsw remote-peer 7 tcp peer-id 10.0.0.2
>
> Hope this helps,
> Jeff Lodwick
>
> >From: "Ravi" <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>
> >Reply-To: "Ravi" <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: DLSW question
> >Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:45:00 -0400
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am working on a dlsw problem, need help from the group.
> >
> >R2 and R3 are dlsw peers. host C is on R3's Ethernet interface. Host A is
> >on
> >R2's E0 and host B is on R2's E1 interfaces.
> >
> >I want host A and B to be bridged on R2. But only host A should be seen
on
> >R3 thru dlsw. I do not want to use any netbios or mac filtering
techniques.
> >I was trying to use port-list and bgroup-list to fix this problem. But I
> >could not not make it working.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ravi
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3