RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas

From: Swink, Dave (DSwink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 17:28:41 GMT-3


   
Sanjay,

The frame relay switch will be providing multiple DLCIs to the interface,
one per point-to-point subinterface. The "frame-relay interface-dlci"
command associates the subinterface with a particular DLCI.

Dave Swink

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold Ocasio [mailto:aocasio@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:08 PM
To: 'sanjay'; John.K.Feuerherd@WellsFargo.COM; roger@securabyte.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas

Yes, the Frame Relay Switch provides the DLCI, but you still need the
"frame-relay interface-dlci" command under the point-to-point subinterface.

============================================================================
Arnold Ocasio .. .. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Network Consulting Engineer || || 7025 Kit Creek Road
Advanced Network Services || || Lake Building
Phone: (919)392-4717 || || PO Box 14987
Fax: (919)392-5758 !||! !||! RTP, NC 27709
Pager: (800)365-4578 ...:||||||:...:||||||:... Main: (800)888-8187
aocasio@cisco.com c i s c o S y s t e m s www.cisco.com
                        "Empowering the Internet Generation"
============================================================================

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
sanjay
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:48 PM
To: John.K.Feuerherd@WellsFargo.COM; roger@securabyte.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas

I disagree..the Frame Relay Switch provides the DLCI.

-Sanjay

----- Original Message -----
From: <John.K.Feuerherd@WellsFargo.COM>
To: <ccienxtyear@hotmail.com>; <roger@securabyte.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas

> For Frame-Relay Point-to-point sub interfaces you do need the "Frame-relay
> interface-dlci" command. Otherwise how would the DLCI get assigned to that
> interface.
>
> Here is how I understand it:
> "Frame-Relay Interface-DLCI" assigns a DLCI to a particular interface.
With
> this command you are relying on INV-ARP to do the layer three to layer two
> mapping for you. This is the only way that you can assign a DLCI to a
> Point-to-Point sub interface.
>
> "Frame-relay map" with this command you are statically mapping the layer
> three protocol to layer two(the DLCI). You can't use this command on a
> point-to-pont sub interface, but rather only on multipoint and the
physical
> frame relay interface. I recommend doing this on the lab and not trusting
> INV-ARP.
>
> As far as the "broadcast" statement after the map command, it is used for
> enabling the forwarding of broadcast and multicast packets. This is needed
> for the correct operation of some routing protocols.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> JF
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sanjay [mailto:ccienxtyear@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:44 AM
> To: Roger Sohn; Ccielab (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas
>
>
> For point to point, theres no need for configuring DLCI's, MAP or
Broadcast
> statements.
>
> -Sanjay
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Sohn" <roger@securabyte.com>
> To: "Ccielab (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:50 AM
> Subject: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas
>
>
> > I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke
> > configuration.(CCbootcamp labs) I've set up Router1(hub) to have
> interface
> > S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint). For multipoint connections,
> it's
> > pretty easy because I just input map ip statements.
> >
> > But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm
> > supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip",
> or
> > frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes. Can
> anyone
> > help shed some light on this?
> >
> > I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke,
> and
> > every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any
> > problems.
> >
> > -Roger
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3