RE: E1 via RJ45 or BNC

From: Barry Bocaner (BBocaner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 17:13:45 GMT-3

Next message: Martyniak, James: "RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas"
Previous message: John.K.Feuerherd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas"
Maybe in reply to: Murphy, Brennan: "E1 via RJ45 or BNC"
Next in thread: Tom Holloway: "RE: E1 via RJ45 or BNC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

you need a balun, basically a transformer that adapts the impedance and
connector. A bunch of companies make them, including Cisco:

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/7206/port_adp/multich/6
728cabl.htm

--
Barry J. Bocaner, CCIE No. 6852
<bbocaner@planetgov.com>
Senior Network Engineer
PlanetGov, Inc. (703) 279-5438
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murphy, Brennan [mailto:Brennan_Murphy@NAI.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:58 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: E1 via RJ45 or BNC
>
>
> Can a NM-4E1-IMA mate with an E1 received via BNC? Are there a couple
> cables that would take you from RJ45--35pin-------35pin--BNC?  Have
> a circuit delivered via BNC but the pre-ordered hardware is RJ-45....
> ouch.  Any tips are much appreciated.  I'm hoping I can avoid getting
> a different NM if possible.
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

Next message: Martyniak, James: "RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas"
Previous message: John.K.Feuerherd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas"
Maybe in reply to: Murphy, Brennan: "E1 via RJ45 or BNC"
Next in thread: Tom Holloway: "RE: E1 via RJ45 or BNC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3