From: @ Home NetMail (@)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 16:59:14 GMT-3
This would be not be a accurate statement. With no dlci designation on the
physical
and point-to-point this is the only way the below would work. You could not
install
any other networks on this interface, and would have to use neighbor
statements. With point-to-point subif's you have to bind layer 2 dlci to the
subif or it will bind to the main physical.
-Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: sanjay <ccienxtyear@hotmail.com>
To: Roger Sohn <roger@securabyte.com>; Ccielab (E-mail)
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas
> For point to point, theres no need for configuring DLCI's, MAP or
Broadcast
> statements.
>
> -Sanjay
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Sohn" <roger@securabyte.com>
> To: "Ccielab (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:50 AM
> Subject: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas
>
>
> > I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke
> > configuration.(CCbootcamp labs) I've set up Router1(hub) to have
> interface
> > S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint). For multipoint connections,
> it's
> > pretty easy because I just input map ip statements.
> >
> > But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm
> > supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip",
> or
> > frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes. Can
> anyone
> > help shed some light on this?
> >
> > I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke,
> and
> > every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any
> > problems.
> >
> > -Roger
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3