From: David Siwula (DSiwula@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 14:21:15 GMT-3
I was having confussion with this as well. I have heard it is best to
use the frame-relay map ip dlci with broadcast as the best approach. It
does not pay to use inverse-arp in the lab. So best bet is to disable
it.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Sohn [mailto:roger@securabyte.com]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Ccielab (E-mail)
Subject: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcas
I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke
configuration.(CCbootcamp labs) I've set up Router1(hub) to have
interface
S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint). For multipoint connections,
it's
pretty easy because I just input map ip statements.
But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm
supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip",
or
frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes. Can
anyone
help shed some light on this?
I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke,
and
every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any
problems.
-Roger
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3