From: Scott Hoover (scott.hoover@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 12:01:03 GMT-3
I hate to egg this on but I can't resist. I have not seen this lab, but it
seems to me the most likely answer (from both a theory and actual CCIE lab
standpoint) would be to use the virtual-link. I would think that you would
have to defend your answer if you would approach this from any other
standpoint. Comments?
Scott J. Hoover
Network Engineer
PowerUp Networks
scott.hoover@powerupnetworks.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Martyniak, James [mailto:martynij@uphs.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:42 AM
To: CCIELAB (E-mail)
Subject: fatkid 502
I initially solved the discontinuous areas via, running 2 ospf processes on
R2 and redistributing between themselves. The final solution used a GRE
tunnel to get area 2 to the backbone.
Which would be more acceptable? I could spark up a debate about which is
more efficient? 2 ospf proc.(memory intensive) or a GRE tunnel(cpu time).
Jimmy Martyniak
Network Engineer
University of Pennsylvania Health System
(215)662-6243
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3