From: Jason Gardiner (gardiner@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 10:05:22 GMT-3
I'm finishing up Fatkid 501 expert redistribution and came across an
interesting issue.
Router 4 and 5 are connected through ethernet in area 2. Router 5 is
also connected to area 0. Router 4 is connected to area 3. Obviously
the area 3 must use area 2 as transit for the virtual link.
It then appears that router 4 is treated as if it's in area 0, as far as
I can tell. Router 5 had a connected /28 that I tried to make into a
/24 announcement for router 4's redistribution into IGRP and RIP. I
used AREA 0 RANGE command. However, it still showed up as a /28 in
router 4's routing table. Once I removed the virtual link, the route
was announced as a /24.
Basically, what I had to end up doing is adding a loopback address on R4
from an unused part of the /24 range and summarize. But this solution
seems so kludgy. Can anyone else think of another way to do this?
-- Thanks,Jason Gardiner Supervisor, Engineering Services Sprint E|Solutions
"You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and still come out completely dry. Most people do."
- Norton Juster **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3