Re: one more question from the OSPF Demand Circuit thread

From: Matt Wagner (miguknom@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2001 - 18:45:43 GMT-3


   
Thanks Peter. That did it. I had to add it to both sides, in case anyone
else is wondering...

Matt

----Original Message Follows----
From: Peter Whittle <peter@whittle-systems.demon.co.uk>
To: Matt Wagner <miguknom@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: one more question from the OSPF Demand Circuit thread
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:14:46 +0100

Matt,

If you are using PPP encapsulation then PPP inserts a /32 route to the
other end when the IPCP is established, - not a problem! But when the
IPCP is closed (as the ISDN call is being dropped) is causes the route
to be deleted, Major issue! OSPF then says 'hey' a route has changed so
it is time to demand that the ISDN comes up again....

Issue a 'no peer neighbor-route' This stops PPP creating / deleting the
/32 route to the other end.

Peter

In message <F233A1D4V0b5wx0E5JL00008906@hotmail.com>, Matt Wagner
<miguknom@hotmail.com> writes
>Hey, I accedentally deleted the solution to the problem of OSPF making the
>BRI interface flap when ospf demand circuit is configured. It hasn't
posted
>to the archive yet. Does anyone still have it? (As you may have guessed,
I
>have a flapping ISDN link right now.)
>
>Matt
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3