From: afiddler (afiddler@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 30 2001 - 20:26:29 GMT-3
Copied from CCO: Note that I found this bug in 12.1(5)T9.
Bug Id : CSCdp14444
Headline BGP:neighbor x.x.x.x filter-list A weight B not accepted
Product all Model
Component bgp Duplicate of
Severity 3 Status R
Version Found 12.0T 12.0ST Fixed-in Version 12.1(1.00.01)PI
12.0(9.1)ST 12.1(1.1) 12.0(8.6)ST 12.1(1)DC 12.1(1.1)T 12.1(1)DB 12.1(1.1)PI
12.1(1.3)E 12.1(1)XD 12.1(3)DB 12.1(3)DC
Release Notes
Configuring the weight for a BGP neighbor at the same time as a filter-list
is applied is not accepted by the parser:
Router(config-router)#neighbor 1.1.1.1 filter-list 1 weight 2 Bad BGP
neighbor argument Using route-map for weight configuration is the
work-around for this problem. This problem is present only in 12.0T.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Wong" <Michael.Wong@nec.com.au>
To: <info@Bertelsons.de>; <kshalavin@ibs.ru>; "Groupstudy - CCIELAB
(E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:40 AM
Subject: RE: BGP Bad Argument ??
> Sorry I should've clarified ..... I had configured the "neighbor
10.100.83.1 remote-as 100" prior to attempting to add the "neighbor
filter-list weight" command. My config is as below before trying the
command.
>
> router bgp 30
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> redistribute ospf 30
> neighbor 10.100.83.1 remote-as 100
> neighbor 10.100.83.1 ebgp-multihop 2
> neighbor 10.100.83.1 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 10.100.83.1 filter-list 1 out
> neighbor 10.200.60.1 remote-as 200
> neighbor 10.200.60.1 ebgp-multihop 2
> neighbor 10.200.60.1 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 10.200.60.1 filter-list 1 out
> no auto-summary
>
> I guess I found a workaround .... I used route maps to set the weight and
applied the route map to the neighbour and it worked.
>
> Just curious to see if anyone else has come across this "Bad Argument"
problem
>
> MW :)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Bertelsons [mailto:info@Bertelsons.de]
> Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2001 9:30 pm
> To: Michael Wong
> Subject: Re: BGP Bad Argument ??
>
>
> Did you configure the neighbour before !?
> Was just thinking, because you have to enter the
> neighbour statement with the remote-as before anything else...
>
> Not shure if this helps :)
>
> Regards,
> Boris
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: Michael Wong <Michael.Wong@nec.com.au>
> Reply-To: Michael Wong <Michael.Wong@nec.com.au>
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:24:44 +1000
>
> >Has anyone seen this problem before ??? .... is it dodgy IOS (again !!!).
I'm running ....
> >
> >Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> >IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-JS-M), Version 12.0(5)XK1, EARLY
DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
> >
> >...... and here is the output.
> >
> >p1r5(config)#router bgp 30
> >p1r5(config-router)#neighbor 10.100.83.1 filter-list 2 ?
> > in Filter incoming routes
> > out Filter outgoing routes
> > weight Assign importance to a list
> >
> >p1r5(config-router)#neighbor 10.100.83.1 filter-list 2 weight ?
> > <0-65535> weight to apply
> >
> >p1r5(config-router)#neighbor 10.100.83.1 filter-list 2 weight 40000 ?
> > <cr>
> >
> >p1r5(config-router)#neighbor 10.100.83.1 filter-list 2 weight 40000
> >Bad BGP neighbor argument
> >p1r5(config-router)#
> >
> >
> >Thanks group .... MW :)
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:01 GMT-3