From: CCIE yong (ccie_yong@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 19 2001 - 03:11:14 GMT-3
Hi, I don't understand your hunt.
what I'd do in the following question is I'll do a :
dlsw mac-address xxxxxxxxxxxx ip remote peer's ip to accomplish that, will
this statement put the mac-address in the local cache ?
or there is other way to do it ?
Thanks
Yonber
>From: "Daniel C. Young" <danyoung99@mediaone.net>
>Reply-To: "Daniel C. Young" <danyoung99@mediaone.net>
>To: "'Padhu \(LFG\)'" <padhu@steinroe.com>, "'Yves Fauser '"
><Yves@Fauser.de>, "'Georges Lauture '" <glauture@hotmail.com>
>CC: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: Explore Frame and DLSW+
>Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 20:40:14 -0700
>
>Hey Padhu.
>
>George, here is a hint: if you don't want your local hosts to have to send
>explorers to reach the remote host, then your local peer must have that
>mac-address in its local cache. What if the remote peer were to advertise
>this mac-address as part of its capabilities exchange?
>
>Daniel
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Padhu (LFG)
>Sent: Saturday, 18 August 2001 3:50 PM
>To: 'Yves Fauser '; 'Georges Lauture '
>Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com '
>Subject: RE: Explore Frame and DLSW+
>
>
> Can you also not do a static mapping ?
>dlsw mac-address xxxxxxxxxxxx ip remote peer's ip. I never tried using a
>wild card mask though with this command.
>
>No failover if remote peer fails though.
>
>Cheers,Padhu
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Yves Fauser
>To: Georges Lauture
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Sent: 8/18/01 10:25 AM
>Subject: Re: Explore Frame and DLSW+
>
>George,
>
>Your question is kind of confusing regarding the wording. If you say "it
>does
>not need to send an explorer Frame", the only thing that I would suggest
>is
>to put a static rif entry into your router. This would enable a users
>station
>on the ring to reach a host on a remote ring using an local explorer.
>But
>there is no mask in this command.
>If the question was "it does not need to send a canureach explorer (via
>dlsw)", than the answer is to type int <dlsw icanreach mac-address
>4000.2200.0000 mask ffff.ffff.0000> on the remote peer, so that your
>peer
>knows that it can reach the address 4000.2200.xxxx via the remote peer
>after
>cap_exchange. But if the users station want's to reach any other station
>or
>host outside of the local ring, it has to send out an single or all
>routes
>explorer frame.
>
>Yves
>
>
>
>Georges Lauture wrote:
>
> > How to configure so that a user connected to a Ring needs to
>communicate
> > with a MAC address starting with 4000.2200.xxxx, It does not need to
>send
> > an explorer frame?
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:53 GMT-3