From: Monty.Majszak@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed Aug 15 2001 - 11:40:53 GMT-3
I hear ya Chris. If you do a "debug ip packet" you'll see it sending updates
out the Loopback interface.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Allen [mailto:chris.allen@callisma.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 7:47 AM
To: Himawan Nugroho; Luke
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Loopbacks and routing protocols
Doesn't RIP send updates out Loopbacks if the Loopback is configured within
the Network Statement? I remember seeing debug ip rip outputs that say
something to the effect of "Update Ignored Loop0: Source Address is my own".
Please all correct me if I'm wrong
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Himawan Nugroho
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:59 AM
To: Luke
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Loopbacks and routing protocols
if the question asked you not to include the loopback into this routing
protocol, that's the time you must do this
otherwise, it's only save a little cpu resources, since the routing
protocol won't send any updates throught that loopback
Regards,
Himawan Nugroho
"Luke" <luke.mendoza@home.com>@groupstudy.com on 08/15/2001 11:14:04 AM
Please respond to "Luke" <luke.mendoza@home.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc:
Subject: Loopbacks and routing protocols
Hello Group,
Is it a good idea to put the loopbacks as passive interfaces...??
so...
int loop 0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface e0
ip address 1.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
router rip
network 1.0.0.0
passive-interface loop 0
I was thinking if this is one area that one could be penalized if done or
not done..
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:51 GMT-3