From: Michael Snyder (msnyder@xxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2001 - 01:16:25 GMT-3
Because if you can get a local interface to show up as an external route, It
could be real handy.
>From what I hear, the lab always proscribes the three easiest ways of doing
something.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Taylor" <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>
To: "Ravi" <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>; "YJC"
<stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>; "Jay Hennigan" <jay@west.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: Distance command in EIGRP
> Ravi,
> Why not simply add this network under the EIGRP process and
> apply the passive-interface command so you're not sending out hellos on
the
> non-eigrp connected segments. This way you don't have to adjust the ext
> AD.
>
> Thoughts.
>
> Nigel..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ravi <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>
> To: YJC <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>; Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Distance command in EIGRP
>
>
> > Tried already, it is not working.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ravi
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: YJC <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>
> > To: Ravi <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>; Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net>
> > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: Distance command in EIGRP
> >
> >
> > > hi,
> > > pls try below,
> > > router eigrp 1
> > > distance 90 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 2
> > > access-list 2 permit 172.50.50.0 0.0.0.255
> > > pls tell me result.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Ravi <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>
> > > To: Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net>
> > > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:31 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Distance command in EIGRP
> > >
> > >
> > > > Jay,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Ethernet0 172.50.50.2/24
> > > > Serial0 172.60.60.2/24
> > > >
> > > > Serial interface participate in EIGRP routing process thru network
> > > command,
> > > > Ethernet is not. sh ip eigrp int shows only the serial interface. I
> did
> > > not
> > > > put network statement for 172,50.50 network, but is redistributed to
> > EIGRP
> > > > using redistribute connected command. So its distance is 170, thus
> other
> > > > routers choose ospf route to the 172.50.50.0 network. As you
correctly
> > > said
> > > > if I use distance 90 90 OR distance 90 100, It solves the problem
but
> it
> > > > changes the distance for all the external routes.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ravi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net>
> > > > To: Ravi <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>
> > > > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 5:13 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Distance command in EIGRP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Ravi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > You are very close to my problem.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I wand to reduce the distance of a network 172.50.50.0 /24 .
This
> > > > network is
> > > > > > directly connected to a EIGRP router. As there is no routing
> > protocol
> > > to
> > > > be
> > > > > > enabled for this network (limitation in a practice lab), I did
> > > > redistribute
> > > > > > connected. When it is redistributed to EIGRP, the distance is
170
> > for
> > > > this
> > > > > > network. The problem here is, all other network has the distance
> of
> > 90
> > > > > > (EIGRP internal routes) but this network is with 170.
> > > > >
> > > > > It sounds like the 172.50.50.0/24, although connected to an EIGRP
> > > router,
> > > > > is not participating in EIGRP and thus being redistributed as an
> > > external
> > > > > connected network. Is 172.50.0.0 in your EIGRP network statement
> and
> > > does
> > > > > it show in "show ip eigrp interfaces"? If you don't want EIGRP
> > running
> > > on
> > > > > that interface you can always make it passive. Does including it
in
> > the
> > > > > EIGRP process but making it passive violate your practice lab
> > > requirement?
> > > > >
> > > > > Another possibility is to change the administrative distance of
all
> > > > > external routes along the lines of "(config-router)#distance eigrp
> 90
> > > 90",
> > > > > but this isn't recommended as it could break other things if there
> are
> > > > > other external networks you want to have at a larger distance. If
> > this
> > > > > is the only external network you're redistributing there, it makes
> no
> > > > > difference.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or, under the EIGRP routing process you could put
> > > > > "distance 90 172.50.50.0 0.0.0.255".
> > > > >
> > > > > > Another router learns this network from a OSPF router as its
> > distance
> > > is
> > > > > > only 110. So now this router chooses the ospf route as best
route.
> > To
> > > > > > overcome this problem, I want to reduce the distance of this
> > network,
> > > in
> > > > > > otherwords, all the routers should learn this network thru
EIGRP.
> > OSPF
> > > > > > should be second option. There are few work around to solve this
> > > > problem,
> > > > > > however, I was trying this method to fix.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay@west.net
> > > > > NetLojix Communications, Inc. - http://www.netlojix.com/
> > > > > WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323
> > > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:51 GMT-3