From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 14 2001 - 21:57:41 GMT-3
Mobile ip requires a third-party mobile ip client on a workstation.
Granted, you could configure what you need to on the router and not be able to
test it...
B.
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Jason Gardiner wrote:
> That's the thing that has me concerned. According to the link Yves sent,
> it was first available in 12.0(1)T and 12.1.
>
> Cisco's web site says for the lab:
>
> IOS features up to and including version 12.0 will be tested on the exam.
>
> If one interprets this literally, Mobile IP cannot be on the exam. Don't
> want anyone breaking NDAs, but if it is on there, the veracity of the
> information on cisco.com sucks and I'm even more concerned that I am
> practicing with the right IOS.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason Gardiner
> Supervisor, Engineering Services
> Sprint E|Solutions
>
> "You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and
> still come out completely dry. Most people do."
>
> - Norton Juster
>
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Jason Sinclair wrote:
>
> > What release of IOS (ie 12.0, 12.1?) was mobile IP first available (please
> > note I am not talking about local area mobility).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason Sinclair
> > Team Leader - NSG
> > POWERTEL Limited
> > Level 11, 55 Clarence Street, SYDNEY
> > Phone: 61-2-8264-3820
> > Mobile: 0416 105 858
> > jasons@powertel.net.au
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > This email (including all attachments) is intended solely for the named
> > addressee. It is confidential and may contain commercially sensitive
> > information. If you receive it in error, please let us know by reply email,
> > delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
> >
> > This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced
,
> > adapted or transmitted without the prior written consent of the copyright o
wner.
> >
> > Emails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defect
s
> > and may not be successfully replicated on other systems. We give no
> > warranties in relation to these matters. If you have any doubts about
> > the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us, please contact us
> > immediately.
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:51 GMT-3