From: Ravi (s_ravichandran@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 18:06:05 GMT-3
You have to use static route or any kind of IGP route in this case. using
policy route is an alternate to static route, you can try that if that is
allowed. There is no otherway I can think of.
Regards,
Ravi
----- Original Message -----
From: Shane Miles <smiles@ftdata.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 4:51 PM
Subject: RE: BGP w/loopbacks no statics
> I don't think I made my question clear. Let's say you have:
> 10.1.1.1-L0-R1(AS1)----192.168.1.0/30----(AS2)R2-L0-172.16.1.1
>
> R1 is in AS1 and has a loopback address of 10.1.1.1. R2 is in AS2
> with a loopback address of 172.16.1.1. I want to configure an EBGP peer
> betweeen R1 and R2. I know I have to use multihop in this case but my
> question is how does R1 know how to reach 172.16.1.1 and how does R2 know
> how to reach 10.1.1.1 without using static routes?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shane Miles [mailto:smiles@ftdata.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 1:59 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: BGP w/loopbacks no statics
>
>
> If I want to use loopback addresses in the BGP neighbor commands on
> two routers in different ASs and there is no IGP between them how can I
tell
> the routers how to get to the loopbacks without using static routes?
> --
> Shane P. Miles
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:49 GMT-3