From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 12 2001 - 16:24:44 GMT-3
But a default gateway is a static route and not allowed in the lab. But
I'm fairly confident it won't work anyway, you must have a route for it
via either static or IGP.
Brian
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Chuck Church wrote:
> I think Shane's problem is that router A won't have a route to router B's
> loopback address, and vice versa. Even if they're directly connected
> routers, you'd need a route to the loopback. Since he doesn't want to use
> static routes or an IGP, could a default gateway work?
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Kyle Galusha
> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 2:19 PM
> To: Shane Miles
> Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Re: BGP w/loopbacks no statics
>
>
> I'm not sure I follow your requirements but I you tried using the following
> neighbor commands:
> ebgp multihop, update source loopback X, and next-hop-self?
> Kyle
>
>
> At 01:59 PM 8/12/2001 -0400, Shane Miles wrote:
> > If I want to use loopback addresses in the BGP neighbor commands
> on
> >two routers in different ASs and there is no IGP between them how can I
> tell
> >the routers how to get to the loopbacks without using static routes?
> >--
> >Shane P. Miles
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:49 GMT-3