From: jonatale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat Aug 11 2001 - 13:22:59 GMT-3
that will work as far as adj (need to match hello, dead, subnet, area, options,
and MTU -- maybe the
std should have included net type, but it did not)
but the db could still be screwed-up
i think nbma and bcast is ok, and mp2p and p2p is ok
but i think bcast and p2p mixed would confuse the Dijkstra - only bcast has DR
which has a net lsa,
only p2p has neighbor rtr in the router lsa and has the subnet as a stubnet in
the router lsa
Jason Gardiner wrote:
> I think you can also do it by setting the hello-interval and dead-interval
> manually on the interface to match the rest of the area. At least it's
> worked for me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason Gardiner
> Supervisor, Engineering Services
> Sprint E|Solutions
>
> "You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and
> still come out completely dry. Most people do."
>
> - Norton Juster
>
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Fred Ingham wrote:
>
> > Shane: These are the same OSPF Non-Broadcast network types and you
> > should have no difficulty establishing adjacencies. If you want R2 to
> > be the DR a better practice is to set the R1 ip ospf priority to 0.
> > Then the neighbor statement is only needed on R2 and the priority and
> > poll-interval options can be dropped.
> >
> > I read the original post as: how to correct mismatched OSPF network
> > types without using a network command.
> >
> > How about a tunnel?
> >
> > Cheers,Fred.
> >
> > SFeldberg@edeltacom.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Try this to establish OSPF adjacency and DR on R2:
> > >
> > > hostname R1
> > > !
> > > int s0.1 multipoint
> > > ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.248
> > > frame-relay interface-dlci 123
> > > ip ospf priority 1
> > > !
> > > router ospf 1
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.1 priority 254 poll-interval 30
> > >
> > > << Frame Relay Switch >>
> > >
> > > hostname R2
> > > !
> > > int S0
> > > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.248
> > > ip ospf priority 254
> > > !
> > > router ospf 1
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.2 priority 1 poll-interval 30
> > >
> > > Frame maps and/or inverse arp will be required for the layer 3
> > > connectivity, depending on the lab requirements.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > > Shane Miles
> > > <smiles@ftdat To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com
'"
> > > a.com> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent by: cc:
> > > nobody@groups Subject: alternative to ip o
spf network command
> > > tudy.com
> > >
> > >
> > > 08/10/2001
> > > 03:59 PM
> > > Please
> > > respond to
> > > Shane Miles
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If I have a network type mismatch over a Frame Relay PVC the
> > > only
> > > way I know to fix it is by using the "ip ospf network" command. I don't
> > > like knowing only one method. Is there an alternative? I read suggestio
ns
> > > about somehow using a route-map but they had no examples and I haven't be
en
> > > able to figure out how.
> > > --
> > > Shane P. Miles
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:49 GMT-3