From: warren perrett (warrenperrett@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2001 - 16:28:34 GMT-3
well what do you know, on a 2600 with 11.2 it works see below
RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Serial1 (172.16.9.2)
subnet 172.16.8.0, metric 1
host 172.16.10.1, metric 1
subnet 172.16.11.0, metric 1
subnet 172.16.4.0, metric 1
subnet 172.16.7.0, metric 1
host 172.16.1.1, metric 1
subnet 172.16.2.0, metric 1
subnet 172.16.3.0, metric 1
network 10.0.0.0, metric 1
network 20.0.0.0, metric 1
network 30.0.0.0, metric 1
network 192.168.10.0, metric 1
network 192.168.1.0, metric 1
network 192.168.2.0, metric 1
network 192.168.3.0, metric 1
network 192.168.4.0, metric 1
network 192.168.5.0, metric 1
network 192.168.6.0, metric 1
network 200.200.200.0, metric 1
on my 2500 with 11.3 (6) it dosent :)
Same config just cut and past job so it cant be that,
Nice one Cisco.............any one know the ver they use on the LAB
??????
8 hrs of my time wasted , Im off to the PUB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>From: "warren perrett" >Reply-To: "warren perrett" >To:
james.xu@eds.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: RE: OSPF to RIP
redistribution >Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:46:22 +0000 > >Yes the IGRP
works just fine , the out going interface is a /24 bit mask >, ALL my
interfaces are. I know about the classfull and classless issues >but I am
confused why IGRp and RIP are acting differently. :( > >Heres some more
info > >ROUTER redist OSPF to IGRP > >I#sh ip route 172.16.0.0 >Routing
entry for 172.16.0.0/16, 8 known subnets > Attached (1 connections) >
Variably subnetted with 2 masks > Redistributing via ospf 1, igrp 1 >
Advertised by igrp 1 > >sh ip route 172.16.0.0 > >O IA 172.16.8.0/24
[110/3358] via 172.16.9.1, 00:00:51, Serial1 >C 172.16.9.0/24 is directly
connected, Serial1 >O 172.16.10.1/32 [110/1563] via 172.16.9.1, 00:00:51,
Serial1 >O IA 172.16.4.0/24 [110/1582] via 172.16.9.1, 00:00:51, Serial1
>O IA 172.16.7.0/24 [110/3357] via 172.16.9.1, 00:00:51, Serial1 >O IA
172.16.1.1/32 [110/1573] via 172.16.9.1, 00:00:51, Serial1 >O IA
172.16.2.0/24 [110/1572] via 172.16.9.1, 00:00:51, Serial1 >O IA
172.16.3.0/24 [110/1572] via 172.16.9.1, 00:00:51, Serial1 > >debug >
>IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Ethernet0 (172.16.11.1) >
subnet 172.16.8.0, metric=10010 > subnet 172.16.9.0, metric=158250 >
subnet 172.16.4.0, metric=10010 > subnet 172.16.7.0, metric=10010 >
subnet 172.16.2.0, metric=10010 > subnet 172.16.3.0, metric=10010 >
>config to do this, simple enough really is : > >router ospf 1 >
redistribute igrp 1 metric 1 metric-type 1 subnets > network 172.16.9.2
0.0.0.0 area 2 > network 200.200.200.9 0.0.0.0 area 2 >! >router igrp 1 >
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1000 10 255 1 1500 > passive-interface Serial1
> network 172.16.0.0 > > > >This outgoing interface has a /24 bit mask >
>Ethernet0 172.16.11.1 YES manual up >up > >Change this to RIP and it all
stops working as below. > > > >A point of note if I redisrtibute from
EIGRP the symptoms are the same . > >I set out on purpose to make my life
easy by having all links and >networks with a 24 bit mask with the idea
of getting the nework upo and >pingable and then introducing VLSM and
fixing the issues that arose. >Hmmmmmm now I question my sanity....... >
>I started the day confident I could do redistribution , now I want to
>boil my head :( > >Thanks for the help............... > > >From: "Xu,
James" >Reply-To: "Xu, James" >To: "'warren perrett'" ,
>ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: RE: OSPF to RIP redistribution >Date:
>Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:03:13 -0400 > >The rip v.1 and IGRP are classful
>routing protocols. They will check the >outgoing routes against the
>network configured in the outgoing interfaces. >The logic is as the
>follows: > > If (the outgoing routes is in the different major network
>from that >configured in the interface) > summarize the routes to major
>network boundary and advertise out. > else (if the outgoing routes have
>the same subnet masks) > advertise the routes out > else > drop the
>routes. > >A couple of days ago, some post a link to "rip and igrp
>routing technical >notes", which should be very helpful. > >However,
this >should happens with your advertisement in IGRP too, are you >sure
it >works? > >James Xu > >-----Original Message----- >From: warren
perrett >[mailto:warrenperrett@hotmail.com] >Sent: Friday, August 10,
2001 10:57 >AM >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: OSPF to RIP
redistribution > > > >Why ? > >If I use OSPF to IGRP then all the subnet
info is advertised . > > >Below are the relevant parts of my configs and
some debug outputs. > > >Any thoughts ? > > > >Router with leg in OSPF
and RIP > >router ospf 1 > > >redistribute rip metric 10 metric-type 1
subnets > >network 10.10.10.3 >0.0.0.0 area 0 > >network 192.168.6.1
0.0.0.0 area 3 > >network >200.200.200.3 0.0.0.0 area 3 > >! > >router
rip > >redistribute ospf 1 >metric 1 > >network 192.168.4.0 > >no
auto-summary > >! > >C#sh ip route >172.16.0.0 > >Routing entry for
172.16.0.0/16, 11 known subnets > > >Variably subnetted with 3 masks >
>Redistributing via ospf 1, rip > > >Advertised by rip metric 1 > >O IA
172.16.8.0/24 [110/1670] via >10.10.10.4, 00:01:05, Serial0 > >O IA
172.16.9.0/24 [110/3124] via >10.10.10.4, 00:01:05, Serial0 > >O E1
172.16.11.0/24 [110/3125] via >10.10.10.4, 00:01:05, Serial0 > >O IA
172.16.10.1/32 [110/1563] via >10.10.10.4, 00:01:05, Serial0 > >O IA
172.16.4.0/24 [110/1582] via >10.10.10.4, 00:01:05, Serial0 > >O IA
172.16.5.0/24 [110/1669] via >10.10.10.4, 00:01:05, Serial0 > >O IA
172.16.6.0/24 [110/1669] via >10.10.10.4, 00:01:05, Serial0 > >O IA
172.16.1.1/32 [110/1563] via >10.10.10.1, 00:01:05, Serial0 > >O IA
172.16.2.0/24 [110/1572] via >10.10.10.1, 00:01:05, Serial0 > >[110/1572]
via 10.10.10.4, 00:01:05, >Serial0 > >O IA 172.16.3.0/24 [110/1572] via
10.10.10.4, 00:01:05, >Serial0 > > > >The routes above are the ones I
want to pass out , BUT >look below it wont >do it ! > >DEBUG IP RIP >
>RIP: sending v1 update to >255.255.255.255 via Ethernet0 (192.168.4.3) >
>network 172.16.0.0, metric >1 > >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com >
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html >**Please
>read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:48 GMT-3