RE: Two areas don't make an ABR?

From: John.K.Feuerherd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed Aug 08 2001 - 02:24:33 GMT-3


   
after looking at it some more, it means that answer B would be correct too.

JF

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:chuck@cl.cncdsl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:04 PM
To: John Neiberger; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Two areas don't make an ABR?

well, sheet!

the default network type for a loopback is stub. Can an area 0 properly be a
stub network?

I thought our conclusion on the other list question was that an area 0 was
not required ( which is true if all other interfaces are in the same area )

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:38 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Two areas don't make an ABR?

After reading the explanation, I still think that both answers C and D would
work. The explanation assumes that assigning Loopback0 to area 0.0.0.0
would not suffice to make it an ABR. From what I've heard, this actually
would suffice but perhaps I'm misunderstanding something.

We had this discussion on the other list a couple of months ago. We were
discussing what would happen in a hub and spoke environment where there were
no links on the hub router in area 0.0.0.0. It was decided that as long as
there was some interface on the hub router that was in area 0.0.0.0, this
would satisfy the requirements. Perhaps that would only apply to interfaces
that actually pass traffic and not to the loopback interface.

Hmm...additional lab research is required, I think.

Regards,
John

| Gang,
|
| Got this email today from Certification Zone. I'm not quite sure I
| agree with the answer. Why doesn't answer 'C' meet the requirement?
|
| Chuck
|
| P.S. I don't have a Certification Zone subscription, otherwise I'd go
read
| Howard's explanation!
|
|
| 7) This Week's CCIE Challenge Question
| ==============================================
| Which OSPF configuration fragment will cause abr1 to function as an
| area border router?
|
| hostname abr1
| int loop0
| ip addr 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.248
| int e0
| ip addr 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
| int e1
| ip addr 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
|
| a) router ospf 1
| network 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
| network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.1
|
| b) router ospf 1
| network 192.168.1.1 0.0.255.255 area 0.0.0.1
| network 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
|
| c) router ospf 1
| network 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
| network 192.168.1.1 0.0.255.255 area 0.0.0.1
| network 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
|
| d) router ospf 1
| network 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
| network 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.1
| network 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
|
|
| The answer to this week's question can be found at:
| http://www.CertificationZone.com/QOW/1/ES/ccie-a.html
|
|
| Chuck Church
| CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE
| Sr. Network Engineer
| Magnacom Technologies
| 140 N. Rt. 303
| Valley Cottage, NY 10989
| 845-267-4000 x218
| **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:47 GMT-3