qos: frame-relay traffic shaping

From: Daniel C. Young (danyoung99@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2001 - 21:13:48 GMT-3

• Next message: jonatale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: FREEK - Why doesn't it declare the serial 0 line down with th ese settings ?"
• Previous message: Peter Van Oene: "Re: OSPF-4-BADLSATYPE: Invalid lsa"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Group,

What is the difference between the following traffic-shaping configurations?

#1
interface serial0
 frame-relay class myclass
!
map-class frame-relay myclass
 frame-relay cir 32000
 frame-relay bc 64000

#2
interface serial0
 frame-relay class myclass
!
map-class frame-relay myclass
 frame-relay traffic-rate 32000 64000

#3
interface serial0
 traffic-shape rate 32000 64000

Many thanks in advance,

Daniel C. Young
Sr. Network Engineer
(909) 221-1928 Direct
dan.young@sbc.com

SBC Internet Data Center
2681 Kelvin Ave.
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 221-1900 Main
(949) 221-1978 Fax
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: jonatale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: FREEK - Why doesn't it declare the serial 0 line down with th ese settings ?"
• Previous message: Peter Van Oene: "Re: OSPF-4-BADLSATYPE: Invalid lsa"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:46 GMT-3