Re: Static Routes & Redundancy

From: Jason Gardiner (gardiner@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2001 - 14:07:58 GMT-3


   
Load balancing and redundancy inbound to the network is not really
possible. They will need to run BGP.

Outbound is easy. Setup two HSRP groups. Have one ether Primary for
one group and Secondary for the other and vice versa. Then point half
the workstations to one virtual address and half to the other.

Muhammed Omar wrote:
>
> Hi guys
>
> Can someone help with the following scenario:
>
> Setup:
>
> The client has 2 connections to 2 different ISPs & wants to establish
> redundancy in case of failure to any one ISP. Can't use any dynamic routing A
T
> ALL (no BGP or RIP etc). Connection to ISP 1 is with a serial link router (L1
)
> which in turn connects to another router via Ethernet (L2). L2's 2nd Ethernet
> goes into a Cat switch (S1). Connection to ISP 2 is also with another serial
> link router (R1) which in turn connects to another router via Ethernet (R2).
> R2's 2nd Ethernet goes into a Cat switch (S1). Into S1 we have another route
r
> (C1). C1's 2nd Ethernet is connected to user LAN.
>
> The Issue:
>
> How to achieve redundancy & possible load balance with static/default routes.
>
> So far in the lab I've tried to put 2 defaults on L1. The 2nd with higher AD
> pointing to R1 but this does not seem to work. Some packets make it out R1 bu
t
> the other half fail
>
> Please help!
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

--
Thanks,

Jason Gardiner Supervisor, Engineering Services Sprint E|Solutions

"You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and still come out completely dry. Most people do."

- Norton Juster **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:46 GMT-3