From: Erick B. (erickbe@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 02 2001 - 04:10:05 GMT-3
What was the syntax of your redistribute and
route-map? I'm thinking something isn't configured
quite right since that should work no problem.
--- Yen <f87321@iplus.net.tw> wrote:
>
> OSPF 1
> IGRP 1
> IGRP 1
>
>
---------------------R1--------------------------------------R2---------------
> 172.16.1.0/24 E0 | S0
> 172.16.2.0/24 S0 E0 172.16.3.0/24
> |
> |
> IGRP 1
> |
> |
> Lo 0
> 172.16.4.0/24
>
> R1's E0 belong to OSPF 1, it will be redistributed
> into IGRP, and must appear in the R2's routing table
> with the metric we specify during redistribution.
> How to prevent E0's subnet being advertised by IGRP
> without using distribute-list?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erick B. [mailto:erickbe@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 2:33 PM
> To: Yen; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Filter connected interface in IGRP
>
>
> Can you post your config or relavant portions?
>
> --- Yen <f87321@iplus.net.tw> wrote:
> > I have a question hope anyone can help me.
> > What do I do to prevent IGRP advertised a specific
> > connected interface, as the interface will be
> > redistributed by OSPF into IGRP, couldn't use
> > distribute-list to filter it, or even the specific
> > interface redistribute by OSPF will be filter. Do
> > you have soultion?
> > As I know, all the connected interface in the same
> > classful network will be advertised by IGRP, how
> to
> > filter it without using distribute-list? I tried
> to
> > use redistributed with route-map to filter it, but
> > failed.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yen
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:43 GMT-3