From: Mas Kato (tealp729@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 18 2001 - 04:24:00 GMT-3
I wanted R6 to use the OSPF default route first since it was the better
route. But tweaking the OSPF externals made the default RIP route look
better, so I had to "tweak the tweak."
Mas
-----Original Message-----
From: Mannan Venkatesan [mailto:venkat_m@ins.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 11:25 PM
To: Mas Kato; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: CCBOOTCAMP 7 - Distance command
Though, I wasn't sure about it (should R6 have OSPF default route or RIP
default route?), I did that. And it worked.
thanks,
Mannan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mas Kato" <tealp729@home.com>
To: "'Mannan Venkatesan'" <venkat_m@ins.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 1:12 AM
Subject: RE: CCBOOTCAMP 7 - Distance command
> Different means to the same ends, I'm sure...
>
> I did the same thing you did to begin with. Did you do anything with
the
> sub-optimal supernet/default routing?
>
> I believe I also ended up filtering the /16 major net summary from RIP
> into OSPF and setting the RIP default route distance to 130 on R6.
>
> Mas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Mannan Venkatesan
> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 8:16 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: CCBOOTCAMP 7 - Distance command
>
>
> Guys,
> I am trying this lab and found some thing. Just want to make sure that
I
> did
> it right.
>
> On the redistribution routers, I used 'distance ospf external 125' and
> got the
> results.
>
> When I checked the solution, Mark used global 'distance' command under
> RIP and
> OSPF with higher distance and then used default metric for the routes
> originated locally.
>
> I found this solution is kind of complicated than mine. Any comments?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mannan
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:26 GMT-3