From: Pickell, Aaryn (Aaryn.Pickell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 16 2001 - 21:10:24 GMT-3
I think that if you want to be doing filtering on a per-peer basis, you need
to start explicitly configuring your peers.
Otherwise, you cannot specify filtering for promiscuously discovered peers
differently from each other.
Aaryn Pickell - CCNP ATM, CCDP, MCSE
Senior Engineer - Routing Protocols
Getronics Inc.
Direct: 713-394-1609
Email:aaryn.pickell@getronics.com
This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of
this message and attachments. Thank you.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian [mailto:signal@shreve.net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 6:16 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: DLSW Peer On Demand filtering
>
>
> I have a question regarding DLSW and filtering
> POD peers. Lets say you have 5 routers R1-R5.
> R1 is the border peer, and R2-R5 are set
> as promiscious.
>
> If I want to say do some filtering between R2 and R5
> is that possible? Or does the filter have to effect
> traffic to R3 and R4 as well, since it just goes on
> the peer on demand defaults section of the config?
>
> Is it safe to say that filtering between the POD peers
> is all done in the "peer on demand defaults" part of the
> config?
>
> Brian
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Brian Feeny e:signal@shreve.net
> CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.222.2638x109
> CCDP f:318.221.6612
> Network Administrator
> ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:25 GMT-3