From: Chuck Church (cchurch@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 13 2001 - 16:19:16 GMT-3
Well heck, if you're going to resort to tampering with the proctors mind,
you might as well go with sodium pentathyl. You can ask them how to do
something, and they have to tell you. (At least that's how it works in the
movies).
Chuck
Disclaimer: Don't go tampering with the proctors. They probably wouldn't
like it.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Martin, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 1:54 PM
To: Mask Of Zorro; ericlemmons@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Dispute CCIE lab results.
I still think a fifth of vodka in the proctors coffee idea will work best,
just my $1250.00 worth
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mask Of Zorro" <ciscokid00@hotmail.com>
To: <ericlemmons@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject: RE: Dispute CCIE lab results.
> Absolutely! My recommendation:
>
> Since I have found this approach to be met with resistance and general
> negativity, I would strongly recommend that you refrain from using
profanity
> and hand gestures commonly known to be interpreted as derogatory and/or
> insulting.
>
> Nevertheless, and intelligent argument as to the effectiveness of your
> solution within the constraints of the exam requirements can get you
points
> that you otherwise would not have earned.
>
> Goold Luck!
>
> Z
>
>
> >From: Eric Lemmons <ericlemmons@yahoo.com>
> >Reply-To: Eric Lemmons <ericlemmons@yahoo.com>
> >To: GroupStudy <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: Dispute CCIE lab results.
> >Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 07:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >You should definitely stand up for yourself if you think you have a
> >valid point.
> >Obviously be courteous about it.
> >The proctor is a "variable" in the CCIE process, and there have been
> >some problems reported from time to time.
> >Eric
> >
> >--- Joe Martin <jmartin@gte.net> wrote:
> > > A guy in my lab made it to day two but missed troubleshooting by a
> > > point.
> > > While I was doing troubleshooting the proctor met with the
> > > candidate and
> > > review the rough spots he had. During that discussion the student
> > > succesfully made a valid point as to the solution method he
> > > employed and was
> > > granted the point which allow him to start troubleshooting.
> > > Needless to say
> > > he aced that section and got his number.
> > >
> > > Joe
> > > CCIE #5917
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf
> > > Of
> > > Ronald
> > > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 5:02 PM
> > > To: GroupStudy
> > > Subject: Dispute CCIE lab results.
> > >
> > >
> > > Has anyone ever officially dispute their CCIE lab results with the
> > > CCIE
> > > department?
> > >
> > > Also has anyone ever dispute the their lab results with the proctor
> > > after
> > > day1
> > > and got back enough points to make day 2?
> > >
> > > I
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> >=====
> >(James) Eric Lemmons
> >Home: 972-862-6581
> >Work: 469-255-1843
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:23 GMT-3