RE: Accesslist question

From: Luke (luke.mendoza@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 13 2001 - 14:01:00 GMT-3

• Next message: Martin, Chris: "Re: Dispute CCIE lab results."
• Previous message: Johnny Dedon: "Re: Accesslist question"
• Maybe in reply to: Lee Waskevich: "Accesslist question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
I believe you are correct...

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Lee Waskevich
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:53 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Accesslist question

Question regarding accesslists see example:

Deny the following with least number of lines:

10.133.1.0
10.197.1.0
so i use
access-list 10 deny 10.133.1.0 0.64.0.255
is that right?

because the second octet is exactly 64 apart so in binary

133--10000101

197--11000101

that leaves the 2nd bit as the only "don't care" bit. I think it is but
cannot find too much documentation on a scenario such as this
Thanks in advance

Lee
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: Martin, Chris: "Re: Dispute CCIE lab results."
• Previous message: Johnny Dedon: "Re: Accesslist question"
• Maybe in reply to: Lee Waskevich: "Accesslist question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:23 GMT-3