From: Cheong Kok Yong (kycheong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 12 2001 - 05:55:27 GMT-3
Hi,
what do you mean by "circuit active" or "without circuit active"
cheong
-----Original Message-----
From: solsun130
To: Dean, Justin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 6/9/01 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: dlsw on lab 17
hi,
i don't know what lab 17 is but....
if the border is the hub(R4) and r3 & r8 are the spokes in the same
group:
with dlsw connection without circuits active:
r3#sh dlsw peers
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP uptime
TCP 1.1.1.1(r4) CONNECT 2 3 conf 0 0 0
00:00:08
with dlsw connection & circuits active:
r3#sh dlsw peers
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP uptime
TCP 1.1.1.1(r4) CONNECT 25 33 conf 0 0 0 00:11:08
TCP 2.2.2.2(r8) CONNECT 8 10 pod 0 1 0 00:01:10
hope this helps
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean, Justin" <Justin.Dean@nrtinc.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 12:40 AM
Subject: dlsw on lab 17
> Quick DLSW question. It says to only use 4 remote peer statements and
have
2
> peers each.
>
> I set up R4 as border:
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 15.15.4.4 group 1 border
>
> then put in a remote peer statement to R3 and to R8. I put r3 and r8
in
> group 1 and promiscous with 1 remote peer to r4. It says each router
should
> have 2 peers, but I only see r4 as a peer on both R3 and R8. Does
anyone
> know if I am missing something or does there need to be certain
traffic to
> initiate the peer. thanks, justin
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:22 GMT-3