From: Ken Snyder (phizzog@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 12 2001 - 01:41:11 GMT-3
This makes sense to me but why did they list both "bandwidth 200" on the
Ethernet interface and "ospf auto-cost reference-bandwidth 10" under the
OSPF routing process? Is the "ospf auto-cost reference-bandwidth 10" ignored
or used in conjunction with the bandwidth command to ensure the bandwidth
conversion is computed with a 10mb vs 100mb link? Thanks in advance!
-Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Lusignan [mailto:rlusignan@birdonawire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:18 AM
To: 'Ken Snyder'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Lab 19 - OSPF Cost
Alternative to reference bandwidth is to manually set the bandwidth on the
interfaces. Cost - 100000000/bandwidth. So, by setting the bandwidth on
the interface to 2000000 (100000000/2000000=50) you get your cost without
using the ip ospf cost command. Hth
-Russ
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Snyder [mailto:phizzog@home.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:30 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Lab 19 - OSPF Cost
CCBOOTCAMP Lab 19 Section Two, Task Three, #5 states to set the Ethernet
links in Vlan A to a OSPF Cost of 50 without using the OSPF Cost command.
The answer "ospf auto-cost reference-bandwidth 10" uses a "10" to represent
the OSPF cost of 50. I don't understand the conversion used to represent an
OSPF cost of "50" with a vlaue of "10" listed in the command. Does anyone
know the conversion formula used to obtain this value?
-Ken
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:22 GMT-3