WFQ and BRIs

From: Mas Kato (tealp729@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 11 2001 - 15:21:07 GMT-3

Next message: Jason1: "OT: Upgrade of 1900 standard to 1900 enterprise"
Previous message: Mas Kato: "RE: Load threshhold 1 keeps the line flapping!!"
Next in thread: Rick Stephens: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Rick Stephens: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Mas Kato: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Chuck Church: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Mas Kato: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Mohammed Alwosh Al-Samarrai: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Many moons ago, turning off weighted fair queueing ('no fair-queue') on
BRIs was standard practice. I don't remember why. Was it a workaround
for a code-path problem or something? An archive search turned up zilch.

Anyone?

Mas
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

Next message: Jason1: "OT: Upgrade of 1900 standard to 1900 enterprise"
Previous message: Mas Kato: "RE: Load threshhold 1 keeps the line flapping!!"
Next in thread: Rick Stephens: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Rick Stephens: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Mas Kato: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Chuck Church: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Mas Kato: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Maybe reply: Mohammed Alwosh Al-Samarrai: "RE: WFQ and BRIs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:22 GMT-3