From: Mas Kato (tealp729@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 11 2001 - 02:33:52 GMT-3
Man, that's weird.
I reproduced the same behavior with local policy routing--the source
address in the debugs was my e0 interface when the e0 interface was in
the same major net as the destination.
Pinging the same destination, the source address changed to the S1 (out)
interface when I placed the e0 interface into a different major net.
Still pinging the same destination, the source address continued to be
the S1 interface even when I added the e0 major net under the routing
process so it was known to the destination.
When I changed the e0 interface back to its original address, the source
changed back to e0!
IP route caching was turned off in all trials.
Bizzare. But it looks like it should still work even though the LAN
interface(s) are not known to the destination. Smells like a hack...
Mas
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Roman Rodichev
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 4:36 PM
To: dirarhakeem@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: policy routing and output interface
I had the same problem, and I'm confused. This makes it impossible for
the
packet to get routed back to the source. If someone knows a solution,
please
advise
>From: Dirar Hakeem <dirarhakeem@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Dirar Hakeem <dirarhakeem@yahoo.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: policy routing and output interface
>Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
>
>All,
>
>Four days to go, and I feel I'm asking a basic
>question. I'm doing lab 18, and when I do policy
>routing on the router and tell it to send packets out
>of the serial interface, it gives the packet the
>source address of the ehternet or Token ring interface
>(debug showed me that) If I dont' have any LAN
>interface active on the router, the packet gets the
>source address of the serial interface. I tried
>adding a mac-address to the serial interface and that
>didn't solve it. Is this normal????
>If yes, what's the way around it, and if not, has
>anybody encountered this before?
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:22 GMT-3