From: Roman Rodichev (rodic000@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 10 2001 - 19:14:32 GMT-3
Ryan, it's a fact. It's not included in the blue print of R/S. MPLS is a
separate topic and it would be included. On the other hand, C/S blueprint
has it.
>From: "Ryan LaTorre" <cisco@crl.fdns.net>
>Reply-To: "Ryan LaTorre" <cisco@crl.fdns.net>
>To: "Andrew" <arousch@home.com>, "Groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: mpls lab equipments
>Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 17:52:26 -0400
>
>Okay, my point is where did this "fact" come from? The only offical
>source of information is Cisco's site. The CCIE section, and the
>Networkers presentations I suppose. I've never seen MPLS excluded in any
>official documents. I think your fact is based on rumour.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Andrew" <arousch@home.com>
>To: "Ryan LaTorre" <cisco@crl.fdns.net>; "cao lingwei"
><caolw@fosco.com.cn>; "Groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 1:58 PM
>Subject: Re: mpls lab equipments
>
>
> > It's a fact that MPLS is not on the R/S lab.
> >
> > At 12:39 PM 6/10/01 -0400, Ryan LaTorre wrote:
> > >Just to make a point here, just because people on Groupstudy may have
> > >"heard" MPLS is not on the test doesn't mean that it's not. Anything
> > >that can be run on the equipment list is fair game except for the
>list
> > >of excluded topics on cisco.com. The lab equipment list does contain
> > >3600's (for example).
> > >
> > >Now, that's not to say I'd spend months learning every last detail of
> > >MPLS, but I would not be surprised to see it, and therefore would
> > >probably learn the basics, just in case.
> > >
> > >Ryan
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:21 GMT-3