Re: DLSW+ Icanreach and bit swapping.

From: Roman Rodichev (rodic000@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 10 2001 - 18:54:37 GMT-3

• Next message: Ken Yeo: "Re: TrBRF and TrCRF"
• Previous message: Richard Geiger: "Re: route tagging"
• Maybe in reply to: Luke: "DLSW+ Icanreach and bit swapping."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Just remember that you always need to specify non-canonical in DLSW
configuration.

>From: "Luke" <luke.mendoza@home.com>
>Reply-To: "Luke" <luke.mendoza@home.com>
>To: "Ccie \(E-mail\)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: DLSW+ Icanreach and bit swapping.
>Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:19:07 -0700
>
>Hello all,
>
>Forgive this simple question but DLSW+ is really my weak point.
>
>When is it required to do a bit swap (ethernet >token ring) I saw a
>previous
>post saying that its required to bit swap when doing a mac-icanreach from
>ethernet to token ring...
>
>Is there another instance when this is needed?
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Luke
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: Ken Yeo: "Re: TrBRF and TrCRF"
• Previous message: Richard Geiger: "Re: route tagging"
• Maybe in reply to: Luke: "DLSW+ Icanreach and bit swapping."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:21 GMT-3