From: Richard Geiger (geiger_rich@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 07 2001 - 21:41:55 GMT-3
The problem has to do with rip.
Rip will only distribute addresses with the same subnets as exists on the
rip router. so if rip receives a /8 and it has /24 addresses only it is
not going to redistribute it. I would have to see the addresses on all the
routers to give you a good answer.
Look at this problem
152.1.0.1/24 R1 10.0.0.1 /8 --- 10.0.0.2/8 R2 152.2.0.1 /24
This is the classic disconnected subnets problem, R2 will not distribute the
152.1.x.x adresses because the interface in question is a different mask.
This problem can be solved through the use of tunnels, or secondary ip
addresses on the link.
I hope thats I am not too confusing.
>From: "Nathan Cruz" <cciesoon@home.com>
>Reply-To: "Nathan Cruz" <cciesoon@home.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Simple Redistribution question???
>Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:44:33 +0100
>
>Could you guys please check my understanding of this. I tried this out in
>my
>home lab and it seems to be correct but I just want to make sure.
>
>If I have three routers. On R3 I redistribute Rip into Eigrp. On R2 I
>redistribute EIGRP into OSPF. On router R1 I get the route to the 10.x.x.x
>network. This is what I expected.
>
>R1 -----OSPF-------R2-----EIGRP-----R3-----RIP-10.x.x.x
>
>Now I do it again. But this time I don't get the results I expected. On R2
>I
>redistribute Rip into EIGRP and EIGRP into OSPF. How come I don't get the
>10.x.x.x route on R1. Did I do something wrong or is this the way it is
>supposed to work.
>
>
>
> EIGRP
>
> |
>
> |
>
>R1------OSPF-------R2----RIP----R3- 10.x.x.x
>
>
>
>Thanks in advance for your help in understanding this.
>
>Nathan
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:20 GMT-3