From: Guy Farber (gfarber@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 17:45:22 GMT-3
The default-information originate also has the "always" option that you
mentioned. It creates a default route regardless of it's existence in the
routing table. Very useful when you can't do statics :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "ANDY NWEBUBE" <wizdata@hotmail.com>
To: <dongbiao@yeah.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: what's the difference?
> Hi,
>
> there is no difference in particular, but as you very well know, if you
> define a static default route, it would not be advertised automatically
into
> the OSPF domain. You would have to use the Default-information-originate
> statement to get it advertised.
>
> By using the redistribute static, it would do the same job but if you had
> any other static routes defined on that router, that you dont want
> redistributed you would have to do some more configs to eliminate them
from
> being advertised.
>
> Rergards,
> Andy
>
>
> >From: dongbiao lee <dongbiao@yeah.net>
> >Reply-To: dongbiao lee <dongbiao@yeah.net>
> >To: "ccielab@groupstudy.com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: what's the difference?
> >Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:24:24 +0800
> >
> >in ospf ,what the difference between the commands below:
> >A: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x then redistribute under ospf :red
sta
> >B;ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x under ospf use the command:
> >default-originate always ....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > dongbiao lee
> > dongbiao@yeah.net
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:19 GMT-3