RE: Without Frame relay maps

From: Scott Hoover (scott.hoover@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 11:21:32 GMT-3

• Next message: Green, Stephen: "RE: Frame-relay Help"
• Previous message: Roger McNeace: "Halabi and Caslow second editions"
• Maybe in reply to: johnnygwiz: "Without Frame relay maps"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Use PBR since static's are not allowed on the lab.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:27 AM
To: johnnygwiz
Cc: ccie
Subject: Re: Without Frame relay maps

PBR or static routing would be one way

On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, johnnygwiz wrote:

> I have a lab that states that I need to connect R1, R2, AND R5 via frame
> relay R1 and R2 do not have sub interfaces. R5 has a multipoint sub
> interface. I am allowed to use frame map statements on R1 and R5 but not
on
> R2. How do I configure the routers such that R2 can ping R1and vise
versa?
> I can ping R5 from R2 and R1 and I can ping R2 from R5 and can ping R1
from
> R5 but not R2 from R1 and not R1 from R2.
>
>
> R1 -------------|
> \Frame
> ------------R5
> /
> R2 -------------|
>
>

• Next message: Green, Stephen: "RE: Frame-relay Help"
• Previous message: Roger McNeace: "Halabi and Caslow second editions"
• Maybe in reply to: johnnygwiz: "Without Frame relay maps"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:19 GMT-3