From: Haohong Lin (hhlin@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 09:47:49 GMT-3
why another DV routing protocol-- IGRP-- can redistribute connected netwoks?
----- Original Message -----
From: "garry baker" <fallow46@yahoo.com>
To: "Haohong Lin" <hhlin@szskzj.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: redistribute rip to ospf
If the route you wish to redistribute is a connected
route you will need to redistribute connected.
Garry
--- Haohong Lin <hhlin@szskzj.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to redistribute rip route '172.17.59.80/28'
> to ospf process, the
> route entry was connected route. After I pressed
> commands as needed, I found
> that '172.17.59.80/28' wasn't in ospf database. Why?
>
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 172.17.59.81 255.255.255.240
> !
> router ospf 10
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> redistribute rip subnets route-map filterrip
> network 172.17.59.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 172.17.59.18 0.0.0.0 area 0
> !
> router rip
> passive-interface Async1
> passive-interface Serial0
> passive-interface Serial1
> network 172.17.0.0
> !
> access-list 2 permit 172.17.59.80 0.0.0.15
> !
> route-map filterrip permit 10
> match ip address 2
> !
> !
> R4#sh ip ospf da
>
> OSPF Router with ID (172.17.59.81) (Process
> ID 10)
>
> ...<omit>
> Type-5 AS External Link States
>
> Link ID ADV Router Age Seq#
> Checksum Tag
> 172.17.59.48 172.17.59.81 69
> 0x80000006 0x63D3 0
> 172.17.59.64 172.17.59.81 69
> 0x80000006 0xC264 0
> R4#
>
> Another question: how to test rip authentication
> functioning.
>
>
> regards,
>
> Haohong Lin
> **Please
> read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:19 GMT-3