From: Ilya Mazhara (willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 09:32:57 GMT-3
Directly connected interface with rip on should be placed into ospd as
rip derived.
You can see that via
sh ip rip data or sh ip osp da external
Marcel Leuenberger wrote:
>
> RIP does not have a topology-database like EIGRP or a SPF-database like
> OSPF/IS-IS
> So RIP just send/receive updates and place these routes in the routers
> routing-table (if
> So if you are redistributing RIP in an other route-process, only learned
> RIP-routes a redistributed!
>
> Did that help? Or am I wrong?
>
> "Haohong Lin" <hhlin@szskzj.com>
> Gesendet von: nobody@groupstudy.com
> 06.06.01 12:46
> Bitte antworten an "Haohong Lin"
>
>
> An: "Marcel Leuenberger" <Marcel.Leuenberger@ascom.ch>
> Kopie: "CCIELab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Thema: Re: Antwort: redistribute rip to ospf
>
> Why connected networks are in IGRP routing table, but RIP is NOT.
>
> Haohong Lin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Marcel Leuenberger
> To: Haohong Lin
> Cc: CCIELab ; nobody@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:28 PM
> Subject: Antwort: redistribute rip to ospf
>
> hi ya,
>
> sorry, another way to solve your problem:
>
> - connected networks are NOT in the RIP-Table. So redistribute RIP does
> not
> work. so "redistribute connected ...." in the ospf-process. this is
> another
> way to solve the problem than my last solution
>
> marcel
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Marcel Leuenberger
> Dipl.Ing.Inf.HTL
>
> System Engineer
>
> Ascom AG
> Bolligenstrasse 56
> 3000 Bern 22
> Phone: ++41 31 999 9944
> Fax: ++41 31 999 9904
> Marcel.leuenberger@ascom.ch
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:19 GMT-3