From: Roman Rodichev (rodic000@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 04 2001 - 21:20:20 GMT-3
yes, Aaryn, you are right. static route would do it.
I wish there was something like:
no ip routing longest-match-rule
:)
>From: "Pickell, Aaryn" <Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com>
>To: "'McCallum, Robert'" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>, 'Roman
>Rodichev' <rodic000@hotmail.com>, jmuruchi@yahoo.com,
>ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Administrative distance
>Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 18:51:58 -0400
>
>The summary routes were just one way of giving the longer match routes to
>r1. You could just as easily used static routes on r1 to do it.
>
>Bottom line is that longest match will always be best. If there are
>multiple routes with the same exact prefix and mask length, then the lowest
>admin distance will be used. Then the RP will pick amongst it's multiple
>routes (and possibly give several routes, if it's able to.)
>
>Aaryn Pickell - CCNP ATM, CCDP, MCSE
>Senior Engineer - Routing Protocols
>Getronics Inc.
>Direct: 713-394-1609
>Email:aaryn.pickell@getronics.com
>
>This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
>privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
>immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of
>this message and attachments. Thank you.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 5:28 PM
> > To: 'Roman Rodichev'; McCallum, Robert; Pickell, Aaryn;
> > jmuruchi@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Administrative distance
> >
> >
> > yeah but do you have ip subnet zero OR no ip classless OR
> > access list 100
> > permit any any doom , access list deny any any stupid routing
> > decisions.
> >
> > On a serious note what happens if you don't summarise. I
> > cant try it as I
> > am sat in a hotel room for the next week. Hence why I am
> > still on line at
> > this time. I am normally well in bed by now!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roman Rodichev [mailto:rodic000@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: 04 June 2001 23:16
> > To: Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com; Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com;
> > jmuruchi@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Administrative distance
> >
> >
> >
> > Aaryn is right
> >
> > try this funny scenario:
> >
> > R1--R2
> >
> > both run EIGRP
> >
> > R1 interface is 192.168.0.1/24
> > R2 interface is 192.168.0.2/24
> >
> > now put ip summary-address eigrp X 192.168.0.0
> > 255.255.255.128 on R1's
> > interface, R2 will no longer be able to ping local interface
> >
> > Roman
> >
> > >From: "McCallum, Robert" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
> > >Reply-To: "McCallum, Robert" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
> > >To: "'Pickell, Aaryn'" <Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com>,
> > "'Juan Carlos
> >
> > >Muruchi'" <jmuruchi@yahoo.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: RE: Administrative distance
> > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:51:39 +0100
> > >
> > >Shoot me down in flames now if need be BUT I am having a lapse in
> > >concentration i.e. too late at night.... the rules of route
> > picking... is
> > >it
> > >not directly connected b4 longest match? or does longest
> > match win overall?
> > >I am sure it is the latter but my brain is now questioning
> > me as if I am
> > >wrong !!!!
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Pickell, Aaryn [mailto:Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com]
> > >Sent: 04 June 2001 20:56
> > >To: 'Juan Carlos Muruchi'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: RE: Administrative distance
> > >
> > >
> > >Not that I know of.
> > >
> > >You can sort of work around this, though... if you have a /24 network
> > >directly connected, and you want to use a different route to
> > get to that
> > >segment, you can use two /25 routes in your routing table.
> > That way, the
> > >longest match will supercede and you'll take the other path,
> > instead of the
> > >directly connected.
> > >
> > >It's up to you to generate the two /25 routes, though.
> > Statics, or inject
> > >them into a routing protocol somewhere else... whatever.
> > >
> > >Aaryn Pickell - CCNP ATM, CCDP, MCSE
> > >Senior Engineer - Routing Protocols
> > >Getronics Inc.
> > >Direct: 713-394-1609
> > >Email:aaryn.pickell@getronics.com
> > >
> > >This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
> > >privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
> > >immediately by replying to this message and please destroy
> > all copies of
> > >this message and attachments. Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Juan Carlos Muruchi [mailto:jmuruchi@yahoo.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:36 PM
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: Administrative distance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know if it is posible to change
> > > > administrative distance of a directly conected
> > > > network?
> > > > If it is posible, how can you do it?
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:18 GMT-3